Devin Patent is a trademark and patent attorneyship office in Istanbul. Searches, filings, oppositions, renewals, recordals and portfolio administration before TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, WIPO and the EPO — one office for every stage, with each step weighed against the statute and the case law behind it.
Every Filing Is A Document Someone Will Later Read Against You.
Devin Patent is a trademark and patent attorneyship office based in Istanbul, acting for Turkish and international rights holders. Registered attorneys handle every stage of a right — searches, applications, oppositions, YİDK proceedings, renewals, recordals and portfolio administration before TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, WIPO and the EPO.
What separates the office from most of the market is where its people come from. Our attorneys have legal training, and a specification, a claim set or an opposition brief is drafted the way a document is drafted when you expect it to be tested later — against the statute, against examination practice, and against the case law that sits behind both.
That shows up in ordinary decisions. Which classes to file and how to word them. How broadly to draft a claim before it stops being defensible. Whether to build evidence of use in the first year rather than assemble it under deadline pressure in the fifth. Whether a consent letter is worth asking for, and what it should say.
Portfolios are run on a single calendar. Opposition windows, renewal dates and annuity deadlines are docketed centrally, audits identify dormant rights and gaps in class coverage, and clients receive scheduled status reporting rather than an invoice and a certificate.
Court proceedings, compensation claims, criminal complaints, contract drafting and advisory work are not carried out here. They are handled by our law firm, Devin Law & IP, and a file moves between the two offices without losing its history.
Every file is handled by registered trademark attorneys who also hold a legal education; patent files are prepared together with patent attorneys, and the European route with European patent attorneys. Examination decisions are read against the statute and the case law behind them rather than accepted as administrative outcomes.
Searched Before It Is Filed
Nothing goes to the register before it has been searched. Availability, identity and prior art searches are run first, and where the result is negative we say so plainly instead of filing an application that will not survive examination.
One Calendar, Nothing Missed
Opposition windows, renewal dates, annuities and national phase deadlines are docketed centrally with layered reminders. Deadline discipline is the single most valuable thing an attorneyship office can offer, and we treat it that way.
Filed Abroad Under One Roof
Madrid, PCT, the European patent route, the Hague System, EUIPO and direct national filings are coordinated from Istanbul through a vetted associate network, so strategy, timing and budget stay consistent across every jurisdiction.
A Clear Route To The Courtroom
When a matter has to leave the register and go to court, it moves to Devin Law & IP with the full prosecution history behind it. Nothing is rebuilt from scratch and nothing is lost in the handover.
03
Attorneyship Services Across the Life of a Right
01
Trademarks
Availability searches, class and specification strategy, filings, oppositions and YİDK proceedings before TÜRKPATENT, with evidence of use built from the first year.
Explore →
02
Patents & Utility Models
Prior art searches, claim and specification drafting, TÜRKPATENT examination, PCT national phase, European patents, annuities and post-grant opposition.
Explore →
03
Industrial Designs
Novelty and individual character assessment, multiple applications, visual preparation, Locarno classification, oppositions and the Hague route.
Explore →
04
International Filing Systems
Madrid Protocol designations, PCT and the European patent route, Hague design registrations, EUIPO filings and direct national applications through our associate network.
Explore →
05
Watch, Renewals & Portfolio Administration
Bulletin and competitor watch, central docketing, renewal programmes, portfolio audits, cost planning and scheduled client reporting.
Explore →
06
Recordals, Assignments & Licensing
Assignments, mergers, name and address changes, licence and pledge recordals, chain-of-title repair and portfolio due diligence.
Explore →
07
Domain Names & Digital Assets
.tr allocation and documents, defensive registrations, UDRP and URS complaints, marketplace takedowns and social media impersonation.
Explore →
08
Geographical Indications
Menşe adı and mahreç işareti applications, technical specifications, control plans, emblem use, producer registers and EU applications.
Explore →
"From the first search to the last renewal — every legal step weighed in between."
Ranked in five practice categories in Türkiye — Uğurcan Tekin & İnci Özçilsal recognised as Rising Stars.
Recommended · 2026WTR 1000
Uğurcan Tekin recognised individually for trademark protection and international IP strategies.
Ranked · EMEA 2026The Legal 500 EMEA
Uğurcan Tekin — Next Generation Partner for Intellectual Property and Media & Entertainment.
Tier 2 · 2026Media Law International
Uğurcan Tekin — Top 10 Recommended Media Lawyers in Turkey.
Also ranked by the same directories in their 2025 editions — The Legal 500 EMEA, Media Law International, IP STARS and the WTR 1000.
05
Our Team
Uğurcan Tekin, LL.MPartner / Attorney at Law — Trademark Attorney
Alican Tekin, LL.MPartner — Trademark Attorney
Kadir Karasu, MBAPartner
Tevrat TekinCounsel / Attorney at Law
İnci ÖzçilsalAttorney at Law
Beyza ErdemirAttorney at Law
Şevval Ezgi DemirAttorney at Law
Mehmet Kerem KüçükTrademark & Patent Specialist
Berkay KizenFinance Specialist
Aleyna KalburcuLegal Trainee
Sıla UçarLegal Trainee
Uğurcan Tekin, LL.MPartner / Attorney at Law — Trademark Attorney
Alican Tekin, LL.MPartner — Trademark Attorney
Kadir Karasu, MBAPartner
Tevrat TekinCounsel / Attorney at Law
İnci ÖzçilsalAttorney at Law
Beyza ErdemirAttorney at Law
Şevval Ezgi DemirAttorney at Law
Mehmet Kerem KüçükTrademark & Patent Specialist
Berkay KizenFinance Specialist
Aleyna KalburcuLegal Trainee
Sıla UçarLegal Trainee
06
Insights
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026 (II): The Data Breach Notifications of 21 October 2026
26 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: Settlement Decisions in the Seedling Sector and Short-Form Decisions
26 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 19–25 October 2026: The ETS Market Regulation, the Metin Yamalak (5) Decision and the Court of Cassation Decision on SİSBİS Records
26 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The Catering Tender Investigation and the Media Markt Decision
19 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 12–18 October 2026: Extension of the Minimum Capital Deadline, the Muhammet Babur Decision on an Advertisement Board Fine and the Machinery Safety Regulation
19 October 2026 — Read →
Copyright
Playing Music from a Subscription App on Business Premises and Criminal Liability: The Decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of 5 May 2026
15 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026: The Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Work Communication Channels and the Breach Notifications of 7 October 2026
12 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The EssilorLuxottica Commitments, and the Investigation and Interim Measure in the Instant Noodle Market
12 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 5–11 October 2026: The Regulation on Age Verification on Social Networks, the Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Electronic Notification in Tax Matters
12 October 2026 — Read →
Maritime & IP
Undeclared Goods on Board: Conviction and Acquittal Criteria in Smuggling Cases
9 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026 (II): The Data Breach Notifications of 21 October 2026
26 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: Settlement Decisions in the Seedling Sector and Short-Form Decisions
26 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 19–25 October 2026: The ETS Market Regulation, the Metin Yamalak (5) Decision and the Court of Cassation Decision on SİSBİS Records
26 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The Catering Tender Investigation and the Media Markt Decision
19 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 12–18 October 2026: Extension of the Minimum Capital Deadline, the Muhammet Babur Decision on an Advertisement Board Fine and the Machinery Safety Regulation
19 October 2026 — Read →
Copyright
Playing Music from a Subscription App on Business Premises and Criminal Liability: The Decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of 5 May 2026
15 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026: The Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Work Communication Channels and the Breach Notifications of 7 October 2026
12 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The EssilorLuxottica Commitments, and the Investigation and Interim Measure in the Instant Noodle Market
12 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 5–11 October 2026: The Regulation on Age Verification on Social Networks, the Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Electronic Notification in Tax Matters
12 October 2026 — Read →
Maritime & IP
Undeclared Goods on Board: Conviction and Acquittal Criteria in Smuggling Cases
9 October 2026 — Read →
Devin Patent · Service Areas
Our Services
Eight service areas covering the full life of an industrial property right: searches and filing strategy, prosecution before TÜRKPATENT, international registration through Madrid, the PCT, the Hague System and EUIPO, watch and renewal programmes, recordals, domain names and geographical indications.
Eight service areas covering the full life of an industrial property right: searches and filing strategy, prosecution before TÜRKPATENT, international registration through Madrid, the PCT, the Hague System and EUIPO, watch and renewal programmes, recordals, domain names and geographical indications.
8 practice groups — move across the panels below to preview, click to open.
01Trademarks
01
Trademarks
A trademark file is decided long before a dispute begins: in the class list, in the wording of goods and services, in the evidence kept from the first day of use.
Explore →
02Patents & Utility Models
02
Patents & Utility Models
A patent is only as strong as its claims. What the claim covers decides whether a competitor can design around it, whether the office grants it, and whether it survives a later challenge.
Explore →
03Industrial Designs
03
Industrial Designs
Design protection under Industrial Property Code No. 6769 rewards preparation.
Explore →
04International Filing Systems
04
International Filing Systems
Protection stops at the border unless it is filed abroad. We run international programmes through the Madrid Protocol, the PCT, the European patent route, the Hague System and EUIPO, and directly through associates where a national filing works better.
Explore →
05Watch, Renewals & Portfolio Administration
05
Watch, Renewals & Portfolio Administration
A registration is the beginning of the work, not the end of it. Marks and patents lose value quietly: an opposition window closes unnoticed, an annuity goes unpaid, a class left uncovered becomes a competitor's opening.
Explore →
06Recordals, Assignments & Licensing
06
Recordals, Assignments & Licensing
Ownership that is not on the register is ownership you cannot rely on. Transfers, mergers, licences and pledges only take effect against third parties once they are recorded, and a gap in that chain tends to surface at the worst moment - during a sale, a financing round or an enforcement step.
Explore →
07Domain Names & Digital Assets
07
Domain Names & Digital Assets
A domain name is usually the first place a brand appears and the first place it is copied.
Explore →
08Geographical Indications & Traditional Product Names
08
Geographical Indications & Traditional Product Names
A geographical indication protects a name that belongs to a place rather than to a person.
Explore →
8 practice groups · hover to preview, click to openLegal Services · Trademark / Patent Attorneyship Services
Devin Patent
Our Team
Registered trademark attorneys, specialists and trainees — the same Istanbul team that stands behind Devin Law & IP, working alongside patent and European patent attorneys on patent files. Legal training on one side, register discipline on the other, working on the same files.
Partners & Counsel
Uğurcan Tekin, LL.MPartner / Attorney at Law — Trademark Attorney
Intellectual & Industrial Property, Media Law, IT and Data Protection (KVKK). Legal 500 EMEA 2026 — Next Generation Partner; ranked individually in the WTR 1000 2026, and by IP STARS and Media Law International in both the 2026 and 2025 editions — representing multimedia companies and global brands in high-stakes IP and media litigation.
Profile →
Alican Tekin, LL.MPartner — Trademark Attorney
Co-Head of the IP Department — international trademark portfolio management and cross-border projects. Registered trademark attorney advising local and international clients on trademarks, designs and copyright.
Profile →
Kadir Karasu, MBAPartner
Intellectual Property, Mergers & Acquisitions and Project Finance. Senior-level advisory on complex, multi-jurisdictional matters, large-scale IP portfolios and advanced financing structures.
Profile →
Tevrat TekinCounsel / Attorney at Law
More than forty years of litigation experience — labour law, lease & tenancy, enforcement & bankruptcy and contractual claims before all levels of the Turkish courts.
Profile →
Attorneys & Specialists
İnci ÖzçilsalAttorney at Law
Corporate law, contracts, KVKK/GDPR compliance and intellectual property. Legal 500 EMEA 2026 — Key Lawyer; IP STARS 2026 — Rising Star; active in compliance projects, data inventories and trademark prosecution.
Profile →
Beyza ErdemirAttorney at Law
IP portfolio management, licensing, designs & patents; KVKK compliance and media law. Legal 500 EMEA 2026 — Key Lawyer. Advises national and international clients and takes an active role in enforcement strategy.
Profile →
Şevval Ezgi DemirAttorney at Law
Maritime & shipping law — vessel finance, charter parties, cargo claims and P&I / H&M insurance disputes. Also advises on company formation and commercial agreements across Turkish and foreign legal systems.
Profile →
Mehmet Kerem KüçükTrademark & Patent Specialist
Electrical & electronics engineering background — patent drafting, monitoring and evaluation. Combines technical knowledge with legal process across trademark and patent procedures.
Profile →
Berkay KizenFinance Specialist
Budget planning, financial analysis and reporting across the firm's operations — bringing an analytical, process-oriented discipline to financial management.
Profile →
Legal Trainees
Aleyna KalburcuLegal Trainee
Trademark procedures, KVKK compliance support and general litigation. Studies law on a full scholarship at Istanbul Commerce University.
Profile →
Sıla UçarLegal Trainee
Trademark applications, opposition processes and data protection compliance projects. Istanbul University Faculty of Law graduate supporting registration, opposition and defence strategies.
Profile →
Devin Patent — Istanbul
About Us
A trademark and patent attorneyship office built on one idea: that a registration is a document which will one day be read against you, and should be drafted accordingly.
Who We Are
An attorneyship office run with the discipline of a legal practice.
Devin Patent carries more than 15 years of combined experience from its founders and solution partners. The office is built around registered trademark attorneys who also hold legal training — a combination that is still uncommon in the Turkish market and that shapes how every file is prepared. Patent and European patent files are prepared together with the patent attorneys among our solution partners.
We act for exporters, manufacturers, technology companies, producer associations, universities and individual inventors — portfolios ranging from a single national trademark to hundreds of rights spread across TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, WIPO and the EPO. Files are grouped by right rather than by client size, so a small portfolio receives the same docketing discipline as a large one.
Work is reported, not just done. Clients receive scheduled status reports, renewal calendars and portfolio audits that identify dormant rights, duplicate filings and gaps in class coverage. Where a filing strategy carries risk, we set it out in writing before the application is made rather than after the refusal arrives.
Court proceedings, compensation and criminal actions, contract drafting and advisory work fall outside the scope of an attorneyship office. Those matters are carried out by our law firm, Devin Law & IP, which shares the same Istanbul team and the same recognition in international directories — so a file that has to be litigated arrives there with its full prosecution history intact.
Registered trademark attorneys who also hold a legal education, working with patent attorneys on patent files. Office actions, refusals and opposition decisions are read against the statute and the case law behind them.
Searched Before It Is Filed
Availability, identity and prior art searches come first. Where the result is negative we say so plainly rather than filing an application that will not survive examination.
One Calendar, Nothing Missed
Opposition windows, renewals, annuities and national phase deadlines are docketed centrally with layered reminders and scheduled reporting to the client.
Filed Abroad Under One Roof
Madrid, PCT, the European patent route, the Hague System, EUIPO and direct national filings coordinated from Istanbul through a vetted associate network.
A Clear Route To The Courtroom
When a matter has to go to court it moves to Devin Law & IP with the full prosecution history behind it — nothing rebuilt, nothing lost in the handover.
"Smart approaches to legal solutions with exceptional service."
Articles and commentary from our team. Trademark, patent, design, domain name and geographical indication pieces are the work of this office. Data protection, media, corporate and regulatory subjects fall within the practice areas of Devin Law & IP and are published jointly.
Anything outside trademark, patent, design, domain name and geographical indication work belongs to the practice areas of Devin Law & IP. Those articles carry a note at the top when you open them.
Playing Music from a Subscription App on Business Premises and Criminal Liability: The Decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of 5 May 2026
This article examines the decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 5 May 2026 (Docket No. 2025/4040, Decision No. 2026/5401), which held that playing music in a café through a music app paid for by a monthly subscription constitutes the offence set out in Article 71(1) of Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works (the “LIAW”). The Chamber rejected the operator's defence that paying the subscription fee also covered the copyright royalties, stated that the case law on the absence of intent in radio and television broadcasts cannot be applied to subscription apps, and upheld the conviction by majority. The dissenting opinion concerns the manner in which the evidence was obtained, not the merits. The article discusses the reasoning of the decision, the line of case law on which it relies and its consequences for businesses.
Uğurcan Tekin15 October 2026
Maritime & IP
Undeclared Goods on Board: Conviction and Acquittal Criteria in Smuggling Cases
This article has been prepared with a view to setting out, on the basis of decisions of the Court of Cassation, the criteria that determine the distinction between conviction and acquittal in smuggling cases concerning undeclared cigarettes, alcoholic beverages and fuel found on board ships in Turkish ports and territorial waters. The article first addresses the relationship between the smuggling offence and the sanction applied and tax assessed by the customs administration, together with the distinction between no declaration, under-declaration and over-declaration, and then examines the facts that are decisive in the decisions with regard to cigarettes and alcohol and to fuel, the personal liability of the master, the chief engineer and crew members, the rules on attempt, effective repentance and procedure, and the measures concerning the ship.
Şevval Ezgi Demir9 October 2026
Trademark
Acquiescence in Trade Mark Law: Different Rules for Invalidity and Infringement
This article has been prepared with a view to setting out the respects in which loss of rights through acquiescence in trade mark law differs as between invalidity actions and trade mark infringement actions. The article first describes the decisions of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation on the starting point of the five-year period in invalidity actions and the divergence between those decisions, together with its most recent decision, the decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 4 June 2026, E. 2026/3054, K. 2026/3267. It then examines the criteria applicable in infringement actions and shows that even where loss of rights through acquiescence is not accepted in an invalidity action, the same silence may have consequences in an infringement action.
Uğurcan Tekin · Alican Tekin · Beyza Erdemir5 October 2026
Maritime & IP
Collision in the Sea of Marmara: Civil and Criminal Liability in Maritime Casualties
Taking the ship casualty off Silivri as its point of departure, this article examines the provisions governing collision, the scope of liability in damages, the operation of the criminal investigation, the administrative casualty investigation and the steps that must be taken in the first days following a casualty.
Şevval Ezgi Demir15 September 2026
IP Litigation
Trademark Invalidity Actions in Türkiye: Grounds, Acquiescence and the Difference from Administrative Revocation
A registered trademark is not always safe. A defect that existed at the moment of registration can lead to the mark being declared invalid by court judgment. The invalidity action is the vehicle for raising that defect. The Industrial Property Code No. 6769 governs the grounds of invalidity, the persons entitled to sue, and the loss of rights through acquiescence. This article examines the invalidity regime and how it differs from the administrative revocation route.
Uğurcan Tekin · İnci Özçilsal28 August 2026
Trademark
Proof of Use in Turkish Trademark Oppositions: The Five-Year Test
Under Article 19/2 of the Turkish Industrial Property Code, an opponent whose trademark has been registered for more than five years must, upon the applicant's request, prove genuine use of that mark in Türkiye. Where proof fails, the opposition fails with it. This article examines how the proof-of-use mechanism works, what counts as genuine use, and how both sides should prepare for it.
Uğurcan Tekin · Alican Tekin28 August 2026
Trademark
Trademark Licence Agreements under Turkish Law: Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Licences Compared
A trademark licence is the principal tool for monetising a mark without parting with it. Yet licence relationships built without regard to the licensing provisions of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 expose both licensor and licensee to serious risk. This article covers the types of licence, the written-form requirement, recordal with the registry and the licensee's standing to sue.
Uğurcan Tekin · Alican Tekin28 August 2026
Trademark
Bad-Faith Trademark Filings in Türkiye: The True Owner's Toolkit
Those who try to register someone else's mark, a sign learned through a business relationship, or a name known in the market are treated as bad-faith applicants under Turkish trademark law. The Industrial Property Code No. 6769 keeps both the opposition and the invalidity route open against them. This article examines the concept of bad faith, its typical patterns, and the legal tools available to the true owner.
Uğurcan Tekin · İnci Özçilsal28 August 2026
Trademark
Protection of Well-Known Trademarks in Türkiye: When Does Protection Cross Class Boundaries?
Trademark protection is, as a rule, confined to the goods and services covered by the registration. For well-known marks, the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 crosses that boundary through two distinct mechanisms. This article examines the protection of well-known marks within the meaning of the Paris Convention and the beyond-class protection tied to reputation acquired in Türkiye, and sets out the differences between the two.
Uğurcan Tekin · Beyza Erdemir28 August 2026
Patent
Employee Inventions under Turkish Law: Who Owns the Invention, and What Is It Worth?
A significant share of Turkish patent filings rests on inventions developed by employees in the course of their employment. The employee-invention provisions of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 regulate in detail who owns the invention, how the employer claims it, and what compensation the employee is owed. This article covers the service invention and free invention distinction, the notification and claim mechanism, and the question of compensation.
Uğurcan Tekin · Mehmet Kerem Küçük28 August 2026
E-Commerce & IP
Trademark Protection on E-Commerce Platforms: From Complaint Mechanisms to the Power of Registration
The centre of gravity of anti-counterfeiting has shifted from physical markets to e-commerce platforms. Platform complaint mechanisms can deliver fast results, but almost all of them require a registered trademark right to rely on. This article covers in-platform complaint procedures, the legal position of intermediary service providers, and the strategic value of registration in e-commerce.
Uğurcan Tekin · Şevval Ezgi Demir28 August 2026
Trademark
The Priority Right: The Invisible Calendar of International Filing Strategy
A first filing in one country gives its owner a head start in every other country for a defined period. The priority right born of the Paris Convention lasts six months for trademarks and designs and twelve months for patents and utility models. Managed well, these periods form the backbone of a global protection strategy; missed, they cause losses that cannot be repaired. This article covers how priority works and how to use it strategically.
Uğurcan Tekin · Mehmet Kerem Küçük28 August 2026
Trademark
Trade Name versus Trademark in Türkiye: Two Registries, One Market
A trade name is registered with the trade registry, a trademark with the registry kept by the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. Two separate registry systems operating side by side in the same market create a frequent zone of conflict: the company carrying a term in its trade name meets the business that registered the same term as a trademark. This article covers the differences between the two rights and the principles for resolving the conflict.
Uğurcan Tekin · Beyza Erdemir28 August 2026
Trademark
The UDRP: A Global Arbitral Route against Domain Name Piracy
A domain name identical to your trademark has been registered by someone else and parked with a for-sale notice. The globally accepted way to recover it without going to court is ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. This article covers the three cumulative conditions of a UDRP complaint, how the procedure runs, and how disputes differ under the .tr extension.
Uğurcan Tekin · Şevval Ezgi Demir28 August 2026
Data Protection/Insights
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026 (II): The Data Breach Notifications of 21 October 2026
Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu Kararları — Ekim 2026 (II): 21 Ekim 2026 Tarihli Veri İhlali Bildirimleri
This legal update reports ten data breach notifications which the Personal Data Protection Board (“the Board”) decided, by its decisions dated 21 October 2026, to publish on the website of the Personal Data Protection Authority (“the Authority”). All of the notices were published on the Authority's website on 21 October 2026. The update covers announcements published on the Authority's website between 19 October 2026 and 25 October 2026; no new Board decision summary, resolution of principle or guide was published during this period.
Key takeaway · Kilit sonuç
By decisions dated 21 October 2026, the Board published ten data breach notifications; three attribute the breach to a third-party software library vulnerability in data processor systems and two to a ransomware attack.
01
Introduction
On 21 October 2026, the Board decided to publish ten data breach notifications on the Authority's website. Three of the notifications state that the breach occurred as a result of unauthorised access being gained to a server in the data processor's systems holding the data controller's data, by exploiting a security vulnerability in a third-party software library in use. Two notifications report a ransomware attack, two report unauthorised access to employee accounts by means of social engineering, one reports access to a corporate e-mail account by means of a compromised password, and one reports unauthorised access through the exploitation of a security vulnerability in software. One notification states that cyber security incidents directed at a hotel undertaking's information technology infrastructure and corporate e-mail accounts are under examination.
The published notifications include a notification concerning the encryption of a server holding the examination, test, diagnosis and treatment records of a private healthcare institution operating in Ankara, notifications by public bodies such as İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi and Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, and notifications by international group companies such as Choice Hotels International, Inc. and Baxter Turkey Renal Hizmetler AŞ. The number of affected data subjects is stated as a figure in five notifications, while the other notifications state that the number has not yet been determined. All of the notices state that the examination of the matter is ongoing; the publication decisions do not include any sanction in respect of the breaches.
02
Three Notifications Based on a Third-Party Software Library Vulnerability in Data Processor Systems
By the Board's decision No. 2026/2281 dated 21 October 2026, the notifications of Dermojet Sağlık Ürünleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi, Güllüoğlu Gıda San. ve Tic. AŞ and Kurukahveci Mehmet Efendi Mahdumları Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi were published. All three notifications state that the breach occurred as a result of unauthorised access being gained to a server in the data processor's systems holding the data controller's data, by exploiting a security vulnerability in a third-party software library in use, and that the breach was detected upon the notification made by the data processor to the data controller. The date of detection is given as 10 September 2026 in the Dermojet notification, 7 October 2026 in the Mehmet Efendi notification and 8 October 2026 in the Güllüoğlu notification.
According to the Dermojet notification, the data subjects' name and surname, telephone number, e-mail address, address information and hashed password/user login information were affected by the breach; the number of affected data subjects was reported as 50,636 and the affected group of data subjects as customers/potential customers. The Güllüoğlu notification states that the name and surname, telephone number, e-mail address, address information and stored password values of store customers, together with seller panel user accounts and stored password values, were affected by the breach, and that the number of affected data subjects is 67,193. The Mehmet Efendi notification lists the affected data as the name and surname, telephone number, e-mail address, address information and hashed password value of store customers, together with seller (administration) panel user accounts and the hashed stored password value; it states that the number of data subjects who may have been affected by the breach could consist of at most 15,303 end customers and 18 administration panel account holders. All three notifications state that data subjects may obtain information about the breach through the data controller's e-mail address, telephone number or website.
The Board's Assessment
All three notices contain the statement: “Although the examination of the matter is ongoing, by the Decision of the Personal Data Protection Board No. 2026/2281 dated 21 October 2026 it has been decided that the data breach notification in question be published on the Authority's website.” The notices contain no information on the identity of the data processor or on the software library exploited.
In the notification of Hüşyar Tekstil Paz. İth. İhr. San. Tic. Ltd. Şti., published on the Authority's website on 7 October 2026, the breach was likewise described, in the same terms, as unauthorised access gained to a server in the data processor's systems by exploiting a security vulnerability in a third-party software library, and the affected data were reported as the identity and contact information and stored password values of store customers. The notices contain no statement as to whether there is a connection between the four notifications.
03
Two Notifications from the Health Sector
DNC Sağlık Hizmetleri AŞ: Encryption of a Server Holding Health Records
The notification of DNC Sağlık Hizmetleri AŞ, published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2282 dated 21 October 2026, states that the data controller is a private healthcare institution providing healthcare services in Çankaya, Ankara, and that the breach was detected when the data controller's information technology personnel saw a ransom note in Turkish appearing on the server screen and it became apparent that the database files could not be accessed. According to the notification, patients receiving services from the data controller, patients' relatives, company personnel and business partners were affected by the breach.
The notification lists the personal data affected on the encrypted server, within the scope of the healthcare institution's activities, under four categories: identity data (name, surname, Turkish identity number), contact data (telephone number, address, e-mail address), health data as special categories of personal data (health records relating to examinations, tests, investigations, diagnoses, diagnostic findings, prescriptions and medical treatment history) and financial data (appointment records, invoicing and SGK/private insurance pre-authorisation records). It is stated that, because the server database was encrypted, the exact number of persons and records could not be determined at the initial stage.
Baxter Turkey Renal Hizmetler AŞ: Vishing-Based Social Engineering Attack
The notification of Baxter Turkey Renal Hizmetler AŞ, published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2292 dated 21 October 2026, states that the breach began on 4 August 2026 and was detected on 6 October 2026. According to the notification, a vishing-based social engineering attack targeting the data controller's employees was carried out by unauthorised third parties; this attack enabled “the threat actor to obtain employees' credentials and, through a single employee account, to access Baxter's Salesforce database and an internal data file functioning as Baxter's Active Directory”. It is stated that the affected personal data are basic business contact information such as name, e-mail address and postal address, that the affected group and number of data subjects have not yet been determined and that the examinations are ongoing.
04
Notifications by Public Bodies
İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi: Access to a Corporate E-Mail Account by Means of a Compromised Password
The notification of İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi, published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2271 dated 21 October 2026, states that it was detected on 30 September 2026 that e-mails were being sent in an unusual volume from a corporate e-mail account. According to the notification, it was established that access to the account in question was gained not through a security vulnerability in the e-mail server but by means of a previously compromised password.
The notification states that it was observed that the mailbox contents of two of the accounts to which unauthorised access had been gained were transferred outside the institution, that a rule was created to delete incoming messages, that bulk spam was sent, that message settings were changed, that existing correspondence was opened and that text of a fraudulent nature was added to the e-mail signature field. The affected personal data were reported as name, surname, e-mail address and internal telephone number; it is stated that the number of affected data subjects could not be determined precisely.
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi: Unauthorised Access Detected upon Notification by USOM
The notification of Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2290 dated 21 October 2026, states that unauthorised access was carried out by exploiting a security vulnerability in software used by the data controller and that the personal data of 109 persons were obtained. The breach was detected on 14 October 2026 upon a notification received from the National Cyber Incident Response Centre (USOM). The affected categories of personal data were reported as identity, contact and location; it is stated that the affected groups of data subjects are not yet known.
05
Two Notifications from the Accommodation Sector
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
The notification of Choice Hotels International, Inc., published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2288 dated 21 October 2026, states that the breach occurred as a result of the threat actor gaining unauthorised access to the network account of a data controller employee by using a social engineering method, and that it was detected by means of an alert generated through the data controller's security monitoring controls. According to the notification, the breach began on 5 June 2026, ended on 6 June 2026 and was detected on 5 June 2026. The affected group of data subjects is customers; the affected personal data are name and surname and contact information and, for some of the affected persons, details relating to past hotel stays. The number of affected persons was reported as 9,550.
Akropol Turizm Yatırımları İnşaat ve Dış Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (MW Phokaia Beach & Resort)
The notification of Akropol Turizm Yatırımları İnşaat ve Dış Ticaret Anonim Şirketi, published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2285 dated 21 October 2026, states that cyber security incidents occurred directed at the information technology infrastructure and corporate e-mail accounts of MW Phokaia Beach & Resort, which is operated by the data controller. According to the notification, the corporate accounts suspected of having been subject to unauthorised access may contain personal data belonging to the data controller's employees and guests and to the natural person representatives of its suppliers and business partners; in this context, it is being investigated whether identity and contact information, information relating to natural persons contained in corporate e-mail correspondence, personal data relating to reservation and accommodation processes, employees' personnel and contact information, and financial or transaction information belonging to natural persons were affected by the breach. It is stated that an examination process is being conducted by the data controller in order to determine the start and end dates of the incident, the accounts affected, the categories of personal data, the number of data subjects and any transfer of data.
06
Ransomware Attack on a Foundation's Server Infrastructure: Enka Spor Eğitim ve Sosyal Yardım Vakfı
The notification of Enka Spor Eğitim ve Sosyal Yardım Vakfı, published by the Board's decision No. 2026/2284 dated 21 October 2026, states that a ransomware attack was carried out on the data controller's server infrastructure and that the technical examination of the attacker's method of entry into the system and of the full extent of the systems affected is ongoing. The affected groups of data subjects were reported as employees, students, former students and children.
According to the notification, the affected categories of personal data are identity data, consisting of the name and surname, date and place of birth, nationality, passport number and photograph information contained in copies of the passports of teachers, students and graduates, and visual and audio recordings, consisting of event photographs and passport photographs archived on the server. It is stated that the number of persons and records affected by the breach is not known at this stage.
07
Obligations Relating to Breach Notification
The Legislation Provides
Under Article 12(5) of Law No. 6698 on the Protection of Personal Data (“PDPL”): “Where the processed personal data are obtained by others through unlawful means, the data controller shall notify the data subject and the Board of this situation as soon as possible. Where necessary, the Board may publish this situation on its own website or by any other method it deems appropriate.” All ten notices refer to this provision and state that the publication decision is based on it.
Pursuant to the Board's decision No. 2019/10 dated 24 January 2019, the data controller must notify the Board without delay and within 72 hours at the latest from the date on which it becomes aware of the breach, and the data processor must notify the data controller without delay of any breach occurring within its organisation. In three of the notifications reported in this update, the breach occurred in data processor systems and was notified by the data processor to the data controller. The notices do not state the dates on which the notifications were made to the Board.
Board decision No.Data controllerNumber / group of data subjects affected
2026/2271İzmir Büyükşehir BelediyesiCould not be determined precisely
2026/2281Dermojet Sağlık Ürünleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi50,636; customers/potential customers
2026/2281Güllüoğlu Gıda San. ve Tic. AŞ67,193; store customers and seller panel users
2026/2281Kurukahveci Mehmet Efendi Mahdumları Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim ŞirketiAt most 15,303 end customers and 18 administration panel account holders
2026/2282DNC Sağlık Hizmetleri AŞNot determined at initial stage; patients, relatives, personnel, business partners
2026/2284Enka Spor Eğitim ve Sosyal Yardım VakfıNot known at this stage; employees, students, former students, children
2026/2285Akropol Turizm Yatırımları İnşaat ve Dış Ticaret Anonim ŞirketiExamination process ongoing
By its decisions Nos. 2026/2271, 2026/2281, 2026/2282, 2026/2284, 2026/2285, 2026/2288, 2026/2290 and 2026/2292 dated 21 October 2026, the Board published ten data breach notifications on the Authority's website. In the Dermojet, Güllüoğlu and Kurukahveci Mehmet Efendi notifications, the breach was attributed to unauthorised access gained to a server in the data processor's systems by exploiting a security vulnerability in a third-party software library; in these three notifications the number of affected data subjects was reported as 50,636, 67,193 and at most 15,303 end customers and 18 administration panel account holders, respectively. The DNC Sağlık Hizmetleri AŞ notification states that the server encrypted by a ransomware attack held patients' health records, and the Enka Spor Eğitim ve Sosyal Yardım Vakfı notification states that data contained in passport copies were affected by a ransomware attack.
In the Baxter Turkey Renal Hizmetler AŞ and Choice Hotels International, Inc. notifications, the breach was attributed to unauthorised access to employee accounts by means of social engineering; in the İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi notification, to access to a corporate e-mail account by means of a previously compromised password; and in the Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi notification, to unauthorised access carried out by exploiting a security vulnerability in software. The number of affected persons was stated as 9,550 in the Choice Hotels notification and 109 in the Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi notification; the Akropol Turizm notification states that the examination of the scope of the incident is continuing. All of the notices state that the examination of the matter is ongoing, and the publication decisions do not include any sanction in respect of the breaches.
Full briefing noteDownload the bilingual PDF version of this briefing note.
Reach us about a new filing, an office action, an opposition deadline or a portfolio you would like reviewed. Every enquiry receives a clear assessment of scope, timing and cost before any work begins.
Istanbul Office
Let's talk.
Our offices are in the Ferko Signature building on Büyükdere Caddesi, at the heart of Istanbul's business district. Whether you are filing a single trademark or restructuring an international portfolio, the first conversation is always with the attorney who will actually handle the file.
Court proceedings, compensation and criminal actions, contract drafting and advisory work are handled by our law firm, Devin Law & IP, at devinlaw.com.tr. If your matter belongs there we will say so at the first call rather than after an engagement letter.
On Büyükdere Caddesi — the spine of Istanbul's central business district — Ferko Signature places the office minutes from the TÜRKPATENT liaison offices and the headquarters of the companies we act for.
Build a career where registration work is done properly — with the statute open, the case law read and the calendar under control.
Why Devin Patent
Learn the register from the inside. Learn why every entry on it matters.
Attorneyship is a craft learned by doing it under supervision. We train candidates towards the TÜRKPATENT trademark and patent attorney examinations and give them real files from the start — under review, but real.
Junior colleagues work directly with senior attorneys from their first week — search reports, specification drafting, responses to office actions, opposition files and international portfolio administration. Mentoring is structured, feedback is continuous, and responsibility grows with demonstrated ability rather than seniority alone.
To apply, send your CV and a short note describing your interest in working with our firm to info@devinlaw.com.tr. Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis and every candidate receives a response.
Trademark & Patent Attorneys
Registered attorneys, or candidates preparing for the TÜRKPATENT examinations, who want to run international portfolios rather than process forms.
Internships
Internships for law and engineering students — hands-on exposure to searches, filing procedures, bulletin watch and opposition files alongside experienced mentors.
Business Services
Finance, administration and docketing roles — the operational spine that keeps deadlines from being missed.
Independent international directories consistently rank our team among the leading practitioners in intellectual property and media law in Türkiye. Our intellectual property and media practice has been recognised by The Legal 500 EMEA, the WTR 1000, Managing IP's IP STARS and Media Law International in both the 2026 and 2025 editions. Click any ranking below for the full details.
2026Current Edition
The rankings published for the current cycle — across intellectual property and media law.
Five Categories · 2026IP STARS — Managing IP
In the IP STARS 2026 rankings published by Managing IP, Devin Law & IP is ranked in five practice categories in Türkiye — with Uğurcan Tekin and İnci Özçilsal recognised among Türkiye's leading IP practitioners as Rising Stars, supported by eleven client testimonials on prosecution, enforcement and opposition work.
All Details →
Recommended · 2026WTR 1000
In the 2026 edition, World Trademark Review's WTR 1000 recognises Uğurcan Tekin individually for trademark protection and international IP strategies — identifying the world's leading trademark professionals through extensive research among clients and peers, including his work on global strategies for multinational corporations and proceedings before WIPO.
All Details →
Ranked · EMEA 2026The Legal 500 EMEA
Ranked in the Legal 500 EMEA 2026 edition in Intellectual Property and Media & Entertainment. Uğurcan Tekin is listed as a Next Generation Partner, with İnci Özçilsal and Beyza Erdemir recognised as Key Lawyers — supported by directory commentary and client testimonials on the team's patent, advertising and brand protection work.
All Details →
Tier 2 · 2026Media Law International
In its 2026 rankings, Media Law International places Devin Law & IP at Tier 2 of the Türkiye country chapter among the leading law firms for media law, with Uğurcan Tekin named among the Top 10 Recommended Media Lawyers in Turkey — reflecting expertise in digital media regulation, content management and broadcasting standards.
All Details →
2025Previous Edition
Recognitions earned in the preceding ranking cycle by the same intellectual property and media practice.
Ranked · EMEA 2025The Legal 500 EMEA
Ranked in the Legal 500 EMEA 2025 edition in Intellectual Property and Media & Entertainment, with Uğurcan Tekin as practice head. The editorial assessment highlighted advisory work for the full spectrum of media stakeholders — from multinational media companies to individual actors, directors and agents — and the team's depth in digital media, online content and data privacy.
All Details →
Ranked · 2025Media Law International
In its 2025 assessments, Media Law International recognised the practice as one of Türkiye's leading media law firms, with Uğurcan Tekin selected among the ten recommended media law practitioners in Türkiye.
All Details →
Recommended Firm · 2025IP STARS — Managing IP
In the IP STARS rankings published in 2025 by Managing IP, the practice was listed among the recommended firms in Türkiye — international recognition of the breadth of experience and strategic approach the team brings to intellectual property work.
All Details →
Recommended Firm · 2025WTR 1000
In the 2025 edition, World Trademark Review's WTR 1000 listed the practice among the recommended trademark firms in the Türkiye ranking — reflecting the team's work on filing strategy, portfolio management and contentious trademark matters for domestic and international clients.