Devin Patent is a trademark and patent attorneyship office in Istanbul. Searches, filings, oppositions, renewals, recordals and portfolio administration before TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, WIPO and the EPO — one office for every stage, with each step weighed against the statute and the case law behind it.
Every Filing Is A Document Someone Will Later Read Against You.
Devin Patent is a trademark and patent attorneyship office based in Istanbul, acting for Turkish and international rights holders. Registered attorneys handle every stage of a right — searches, applications, oppositions, YİDK proceedings, renewals, recordals and portfolio administration before TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, WIPO and the EPO.
What separates the office from most of the market is where its people come from. Our attorneys have legal training, and a specification, a claim set or an opposition brief is drafted the way a document is drafted when you expect it to be tested later — against the statute, against examination practice, and against the case law that sits behind both.
That shows up in ordinary decisions. Which classes to file and how to word them. How broadly to draft a claim before it stops being defensible. Whether to build evidence of use in the first year rather than assemble it under deadline pressure in the fifth. Whether a consent letter is worth asking for, and what it should say.
Portfolios are run on a single calendar. Opposition windows, renewal dates and annuity deadlines are docketed centrally, audits identify dormant rights and gaps in class coverage, and clients receive scheduled status reporting rather than an invoice and a certificate.
Court proceedings, compensation claims, criminal complaints, contract drafting and advisory work are not carried out here. They are handled by our law firm, Devin Law & IP, and a file moves between the two offices without losing its history.
Every file is handled by registered trademark attorneys who also hold a legal education; patent files are prepared together with patent attorneys, and the European route with European patent attorneys. Examination decisions are read against the statute and the case law behind them rather than accepted as administrative outcomes.
Searched Before It Is Filed
Nothing goes to the register before it has been searched. Availability, identity and prior art searches are run first, and where the result is negative we say so plainly instead of filing an application that will not survive examination.
One Calendar, Nothing Missed
Opposition windows, renewal dates, annuities and national phase deadlines are docketed centrally with layered reminders. Deadline discipline is the single most valuable thing an attorneyship office can offer, and we treat it that way.
Filed Abroad Under One Roof
Madrid, PCT, the European patent route, the Hague System, EUIPO and direct national filings are coordinated from Istanbul through a vetted associate network, so strategy, timing and budget stay consistent across every jurisdiction.
A Clear Route To The Courtroom
When a matter has to leave the register and go to court, it moves to Devin Law & IP with the full prosecution history behind it. Nothing is rebuilt from scratch and nothing is lost in the handover.
03
Attorneyship Services Across the Life of a Right
01
Trademarks
Availability searches, class and specification strategy, filings, oppositions and YİDK proceedings before TÜRKPATENT, with evidence of use built from the first year.
Explore →
02
Patents & Utility Models
Prior art searches, claim and specification drafting, TÜRKPATENT examination, PCT national phase, European patents, annuities and post-grant opposition.
Explore →
03
Industrial Designs
Novelty and individual character assessment, multiple applications, visual preparation, Locarno classification, oppositions and the Hague route.
Explore →
04
International Filing Systems
Madrid Protocol designations, PCT and the European patent route, Hague design registrations, EUIPO filings and direct national applications through our associate network.
Explore →
05
Watch, Renewals & Portfolio Administration
Bulletin and competitor watch, central docketing, renewal programmes, portfolio audits, cost planning and scheduled client reporting.
Explore →
06
Recordals, Assignments & Licensing
Assignments, mergers, name and address changes, licence and pledge recordals, chain-of-title repair and portfolio due diligence.
Explore →
07
Domain Names & Digital Assets
.tr allocation and documents, defensive registrations, UDRP and URS complaints, marketplace takedowns and social media impersonation.
Explore →
08
Geographical Indications
Menşe adı and mahreç işareti applications, technical specifications, control plans, emblem use, producer registers and EU applications.
Explore →
"From the first search to the last renewal — every legal step weighed in between."
Ranked in five practice categories in Türkiye — Uğurcan Tekin & İnci Özçilsal recognised as Rising Stars.
Recommended · 2026WTR 1000
Uğurcan Tekin recognised individually for trademark protection and international IP strategies.
Ranked · EMEA 2026The Legal 500 EMEA
Uğurcan Tekin — Next Generation Partner for Intellectual Property and Media & Entertainment.
Tier 2 · 2026Media Law International
Uğurcan Tekin — Top 10 Recommended Media Lawyers in Turkey.
Also ranked by the same directories in their 2025 editions — The Legal 500 EMEA, Media Law International, IP STARS and the WTR 1000.
05
Our Team
Uğurcan Tekin, LL.MPartner / Attorney at Law — Trademark Attorney
Alican Tekin, LL.MPartner — Trademark Attorney
Kadir Karasu, MBAPartner
Tevrat TekinCounsel / Attorney at Law
İnci ÖzçilsalAttorney at Law
Beyza ErdemirAttorney at Law
Şevval Ezgi DemirAttorney at Law
Mehmet Kerem KüçükTrademark & Patent Specialist
Berkay KizenFinance Specialist
Aleyna KalburcuLegal Trainee
Sıla UçarLegal Trainee
Uğurcan Tekin, LL.MPartner / Attorney at Law — Trademark Attorney
Alican Tekin, LL.MPartner — Trademark Attorney
Kadir Karasu, MBAPartner
Tevrat TekinCounsel / Attorney at Law
İnci ÖzçilsalAttorney at Law
Beyza ErdemirAttorney at Law
Şevval Ezgi DemirAttorney at Law
Mehmet Kerem KüçükTrademark & Patent Specialist
Berkay KizenFinance Specialist
Aleyna KalburcuLegal Trainee
Sıla UçarLegal Trainee
06
Insights
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The Catering Tender Investigation and the Media Markt Decision
19 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 12–18 October 2026: Extension of the Minimum Capital Deadline, the Muhammet Babur Decision on an Advertisement Board Fine and the Machinery Safety Regulation
19 October 2026 — Read →
Copyright
Playing Music from a Subscription App on Business Premises and Criminal Liability: The Decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of 5 May 2026
15 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026: The Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Work Communication Channels and the Breach Notifications of 7 October 2026
12 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The EssilorLuxottica Commitments, and the Investigation and Interim Measure in the Instant Noodle Market
12 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 5–11 October 2026: The Regulation on Age Verification on Social Networks, the Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Electronic Notification in Tax Matters
12 October 2026 — Read →
Maritime & IP
Undeclared Goods on Board: Conviction and Acquittal Criteria in Smuggling Cases
9 October 2026 — Read →
Media & Advertising
Advertising Board Decisions — Meeting No. 372: 5G Superiority Claims, Consumer Reviews and Blocking of Access to Review-Selling Websites
5 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026: Form of Response to Data Subject Applications and the Breach Notifications of 30 September 2026
5 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 28 September–4 October 2026: Annulment of the Phrase “Indefinitely” in Poverty Alimony, Real Estate Trade and the Distilled Spirit Drinks Communiqué
5 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The Catering Tender Investigation and the Media Markt Decision
19 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 12–18 October 2026: Extension of the Minimum Capital Deadline, the Muhammet Babur Decision on an Advertisement Board Fine and the Machinery Safety Regulation
19 October 2026 — Read →
Copyright
Playing Music from a Subscription App on Business Premises and Criminal Liability: The Decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of 5 May 2026
15 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026: The Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Work Communication Channels and the Breach Notifications of 7 October 2026
12 October 2026 — Read →
Competition
Developments in Turkish Competition Law — October 2026: The EssilorLuxottica Commitments, and the Investigation and Interim Measure in the Instant Noodle Market
12 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 5–11 October 2026: The Regulation on Age Verification on Social Networks, the Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Electronic Notification in Tax Matters
12 October 2026 — Read →
Maritime & IP
Undeclared Goods on Board: Conviction and Acquittal Criteria in Smuggling Cases
9 October 2026 — Read →
Media & Advertising
Advertising Board Decisions — Meeting No. 372: 5G Superiority Claims, Consumer Reviews and Blocking of Access to Review-Selling Websites
5 October 2026 — Read →
Data Protection
Turkish Data Protection Board Decisions — October 2026: Form of Response to Data Subject Applications and the Breach Notifications of 30 September 2026
5 October 2026 — Read →
Regulatory
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 28 September–4 October 2026: Annulment of the Phrase “Indefinitely” in Poverty Alimony, Real Estate Trade and the Distilled Spirit Drinks Communiqué
5 October 2026 — Read →
Devin Patent · Service Areas
Our Services
Eight service areas covering the full life of an industrial property right: searches and filing strategy, prosecution before TÜRKPATENT, international registration through Madrid, the PCT, the Hague System and EUIPO, watch and renewal programmes, recordals, domain names and geographical indications.
Eight service areas covering the full life of an industrial property right: searches and filing strategy, prosecution before TÜRKPATENT, international registration through Madrid, the PCT, the Hague System and EUIPO, watch and renewal programmes, recordals, domain names and geographical indications.
8 practice groups — move across the panels below to preview, click to open.
01Trademarks
01
Trademarks
A trademark file is decided long before a dispute begins: in the class list, in the wording of goods and services, in the evidence kept from the first day of use.
Explore →
02Patents & Utility Models
02
Patents & Utility Models
A patent is only as strong as its claims. What the claim covers decides whether a competitor can design around it, whether the office grants it, and whether it survives a later challenge.
Explore →
03Industrial Designs
03
Industrial Designs
Design protection under Industrial Property Code No. 6769 rewards preparation.
Explore →
04International Filing Systems
04
International Filing Systems
Protection stops at the border unless it is filed abroad. We run international programmes through the Madrid Protocol, the PCT, the European patent route, the Hague System and EUIPO, and directly through associates where a national filing works better.
Explore →
05Watch, Renewals & Portfolio Administration
05
Watch, Renewals & Portfolio Administration
A registration is the beginning of the work, not the end of it. Marks and patents lose value quietly: an opposition window closes unnoticed, an annuity goes unpaid, a class left uncovered becomes a competitor's opening.
Explore →
06Recordals, Assignments & Licensing
06
Recordals, Assignments & Licensing
Ownership that is not on the register is ownership you cannot rely on. Transfers, mergers, licences and pledges only take effect against third parties once they are recorded, and a gap in that chain tends to surface at the worst moment - during a sale, a financing round or an enforcement step.
Explore →
07Domain Names & Digital Assets
07
Domain Names & Digital Assets
A domain name is usually the first place a brand appears and the first place it is copied.
Explore →
08Geographical Indications & Traditional Product Names
08
Geographical Indications & Traditional Product Names
A geographical indication protects a name that belongs to a place rather than to a person.
Explore →
8 practice groups · hover to preview, click to openLegal Services · Trademark / Patent Attorneyship Services
Devin Patent
Our Team
Registered trademark attorneys, specialists and trainees — the same Istanbul team that stands behind Devin Law & IP, working alongside patent and European patent attorneys on patent files. Legal training on one side, register discipline on the other, working on the same files.
Partners & Counsel
Uğurcan Tekin, LL.MPartner / Attorney at Law — Trademark Attorney
Intellectual & Industrial Property, Media Law, IT and Data Protection (KVKK). Legal 500 EMEA 2026 — Next Generation Partner; ranked individually in the WTR 1000 2026, and by IP STARS and Media Law International in both the 2026 and 2025 editions — representing multimedia companies and global brands in high-stakes IP and media litigation.
Profile →
Alican Tekin, LL.MPartner — Trademark Attorney
Co-Head of the IP Department — international trademark portfolio management and cross-border projects. Registered trademark attorney advising local and international clients on trademarks, designs and copyright.
Profile →
Kadir Karasu, MBAPartner
Intellectual Property, Mergers & Acquisitions and Project Finance. Senior-level advisory on complex, multi-jurisdictional matters, large-scale IP portfolios and advanced financing structures.
Profile →
Tevrat TekinCounsel / Attorney at Law
More than forty years of litigation experience — labour law, lease & tenancy, enforcement & bankruptcy and contractual claims before all levels of the Turkish courts.
Profile →
Attorneys & Specialists
İnci ÖzçilsalAttorney at Law
Corporate law, contracts, KVKK/GDPR compliance and intellectual property. Legal 500 EMEA 2026 — Key Lawyer; IP STARS 2026 — Rising Star; active in compliance projects, data inventories and trademark prosecution.
Profile →
Beyza ErdemirAttorney at Law
IP portfolio management, licensing, designs & patents; KVKK compliance and media law. Legal 500 EMEA 2026 — Key Lawyer. Advises national and international clients and takes an active role in enforcement strategy.
Profile →
Şevval Ezgi DemirAttorney at Law
Maritime & shipping law — vessel finance, charter parties, cargo claims and P&I / H&M insurance disputes. Also advises on company formation and commercial agreements across Turkish and foreign legal systems.
Profile →
Mehmet Kerem KüçükTrademark & Patent Specialist
Electrical & electronics engineering background — patent drafting, monitoring and evaluation. Combines technical knowledge with legal process across trademark and patent procedures.
Profile →
Berkay KizenFinance Specialist
Budget planning, financial analysis and reporting across the firm's operations — bringing an analytical, process-oriented discipline to financial management.
Profile →
Legal Trainees
Aleyna KalburcuLegal Trainee
Trademark procedures, KVKK compliance support and general litigation. Studies law on a full scholarship at Istanbul Commerce University.
Profile →
Sıla UçarLegal Trainee
Trademark applications, opposition processes and data protection compliance projects. Istanbul University Faculty of Law graduate supporting registration, opposition and defence strategies.
Profile →
Devin Patent — Istanbul
About Us
A trademark and patent attorneyship office built on one idea: that a registration is a document which will one day be read against you, and should be drafted accordingly.
Who We Are
An attorneyship office run with the discipline of a legal practice.
Devin Patent carries more than 15 years of combined experience from its founders and solution partners. The office is built around registered trademark attorneys who also hold legal training — a combination that is still uncommon in the Turkish market and that shapes how every file is prepared. Patent and European patent files are prepared together with the patent attorneys among our solution partners.
We act for exporters, manufacturers, technology companies, producer associations, universities and individual inventors — portfolios ranging from a single national trademark to hundreds of rights spread across TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, WIPO and the EPO. Files are grouped by right rather than by client size, so a small portfolio receives the same docketing discipline as a large one.
Work is reported, not just done. Clients receive scheduled status reports, renewal calendars and portfolio audits that identify dormant rights, duplicate filings and gaps in class coverage. Where a filing strategy carries risk, we set it out in writing before the application is made rather than after the refusal arrives.
Court proceedings, compensation and criminal actions, contract drafting and advisory work fall outside the scope of an attorneyship office. Those matters are carried out by our law firm, Devin Law & IP, which shares the same Istanbul team and the same recognition in international directories — so a file that has to be litigated arrives there with its full prosecution history intact.
Registered trademark attorneys who also hold a legal education, working with patent attorneys on patent files. Office actions, refusals and opposition decisions are read against the statute and the case law behind them.
Searched Before It Is Filed
Availability, identity and prior art searches come first. Where the result is negative we say so plainly rather than filing an application that will not survive examination.
One Calendar, Nothing Missed
Opposition windows, renewals, annuities and national phase deadlines are docketed centrally with layered reminders and scheduled reporting to the client.
Filed Abroad Under One Roof
Madrid, PCT, the European patent route, the Hague System, EUIPO and direct national filings coordinated from Istanbul through a vetted associate network.
A Clear Route To The Courtroom
When a matter has to go to court it moves to Devin Law & IP with the full prosecution history behind it — nothing rebuilt, nothing lost in the handover.
"Smart approaches to legal solutions with exceptional service."
Articles and commentary from our team. Trademark, patent, design, domain name and geographical indication pieces are the work of this office. Data protection, media, corporate and regulatory subjects fall within the practice areas of Devin Law & IP and are published jointly.
Anything outside trademark, patent, design, domain name and geographical indication work belongs to the practice areas of Devin Law & IP. Those articles carry a note at the top when you open them.
Playing Music from a Subscription App on Business Premises and Criminal Liability: The Decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation of 5 May 2026
This article examines the decision of the 7th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 5 May 2026 (Docket No. 2025/4040, Decision No. 2026/5401), which held that playing music in a café through a music app paid for by a monthly subscription constitutes the offence set out in Article 71(1) of Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works (the “LIAW”). The Chamber rejected the operator's defence that paying the subscription fee also covered the copyright royalties, stated that the case law on the absence of intent in radio and television broadcasts cannot be applied to subscription apps, and upheld the conviction by majority. The dissenting opinion concerns the manner in which the evidence was obtained, not the merits. The article discusses the reasoning of the decision, the line of case law on which it relies and its consequences for businesses.
Uğurcan Tekin15 October 2026
Maritime & IP
Undeclared Goods on Board: Conviction and Acquittal Criteria in Smuggling Cases
This article has been prepared with a view to setting out, on the basis of decisions of the Court of Cassation, the criteria that determine the distinction between conviction and acquittal in smuggling cases concerning undeclared cigarettes, alcoholic beverages and fuel found on board ships in Turkish ports and territorial waters. The article first addresses the relationship between the smuggling offence and the sanction applied and tax assessed by the customs administration, together with the distinction between no declaration, under-declaration and over-declaration, and then examines the facts that are decisive in the decisions with regard to cigarettes and alcohol and to fuel, the personal liability of the master, the chief engineer and crew members, the rules on attempt, effective repentance and procedure, and the measures concerning the ship.
Şevval Ezgi Demir9 October 2026
Trademark
Acquiescence in Trade Mark Law: Different Rules for Invalidity and Infringement
This article has been prepared with a view to setting out the respects in which loss of rights through acquiescence in trade mark law differs as between invalidity actions and trade mark infringement actions. The article first describes the decisions of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation on the starting point of the five-year period in invalidity actions and the divergence between those decisions, together with its most recent decision, the decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 4 June 2026, E. 2026/3054, K. 2026/3267. It then examines the criteria applicable in infringement actions and shows that even where loss of rights through acquiescence is not accepted in an invalidity action, the same silence may have consequences in an infringement action.
Uğurcan Tekin · Alican Tekin · Beyza Erdemir5 October 2026
Maritime & IP
Collision in the Sea of Marmara: Civil and Criminal Liability in Maritime Casualties
Taking the ship casualty off Silivri as its point of departure, this article examines the provisions governing collision, the scope of liability in damages, the operation of the criminal investigation, the administrative casualty investigation and the steps that must be taken in the first days following a casualty.
Şevval Ezgi Demir15 September 2026
IP Litigation
Trademark Invalidity Actions in Türkiye: Grounds, Acquiescence and the Difference from Administrative Revocation
A registered trademark is not always safe. A defect that existed at the moment of registration can lead to the mark being declared invalid by court judgment. The invalidity action is the vehicle for raising that defect. The Industrial Property Code No. 6769 governs the grounds of invalidity, the persons entitled to sue, and the loss of rights through acquiescence. This article examines the invalidity regime and how it differs from the administrative revocation route.
Uğurcan Tekin · İnci Özçilsal28 August 2026
Trademark
Proof of Use in Turkish Trademark Oppositions: The Five-Year Test
Under Article 19/2 of the Turkish Industrial Property Code, an opponent whose trademark has been registered for more than five years must, upon the applicant's request, prove genuine use of that mark in Türkiye. Where proof fails, the opposition fails with it. This article examines how the proof-of-use mechanism works, what counts as genuine use, and how both sides should prepare for it.
Uğurcan Tekin · Alican Tekin28 August 2026
Trademark
Trademark Licence Agreements under Turkish Law: Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Licences Compared
A trademark licence is the principal tool for monetising a mark without parting with it. Yet licence relationships built without regard to the licensing provisions of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 expose both licensor and licensee to serious risk. This article covers the types of licence, the written-form requirement, recordal with the registry and the licensee's standing to sue.
Uğurcan Tekin · Alican Tekin28 August 2026
Trademark
Bad-Faith Trademark Filings in Türkiye: The True Owner's Toolkit
Those who try to register someone else's mark, a sign learned through a business relationship, or a name known in the market are treated as bad-faith applicants under Turkish trademark law. The Industrial Property Code No. 6769 keeps both the opposition and the invalidity route open against them. This article examines the concept of bad faith, its typical patterns, and the legal tools available to the true owner.
Uğurcan Tekin · İnci Özçilsal28 August 2026
Trademark
Protection of Well-Known Trademarks in Türkiye: When Does Protection Cross Class Boundaries?
Trademark protection is, as a rule, confined to the goods and services covered by the registration. For well-known marks, the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 crosses that boundary through two distinct mechanisms. This article examines the protection of well-known marks within the meaning of the Paris Convention and the beyond-class protection tied to reputation acquired in Türkiye, and sets out the differences between the two.
Uğurcan Tekin · Beyza Erdemir28 August 2026
Patent
Employee Inventions under Turkish Law: Who Owns the Invention, and What Is It Worth?
A significant share of Turkish patent filings rests on inventions developed by employees in the course of their employment. The employee-invention provisions of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 regulate in detail who owns the invention, how the employer claims it, and what compensation the employee is owed. This article covers the service invention and free invention distinction, the notification and claim mechanism, and the question of compensation.
Uğurcan Tekin · Mehmet Kerem Küçük28 August 2026
E-Commerce & IP
Trademark Protection on E-Commerce Platforms: From Complaint Mechanisms to the Power of Registration
The centre of gravity of anti-counterfeiting has shifted from physical markets to e-commerce platforms. Platform complaint mechanisms can deliver fast results, but almost all of them require a registered trademark right to rely on. This article covers in-platform complaint procedures, the legal position of intermediary service providers, and the strategic value of registration in e-commerce.
Uğurcan Tekin · Şevval Ezgi Demir28 August 2026
Trademark
The Priority Right: The Invisible Calendar of International Filing Strategy
A first filing in one country gives its owner a head start in every other country for a defined period. The priority right born of the Paris Convention lasts six months for trademarks and designs and twelve months for patents and utility models. Managed well, these periods form the backbone of a global protection strategy; missed, they cause losses that cannot be repaired. This article covers how priority works and how to use it strategically.
Uğurcan Tekin · Mehmet Kerem Küçük28 August 2026
Trademark
Trade Name versus Trademark in Türkiye: Two Registries, One Market
A trade name is registered with the trade registry, a trademark with the registry kept by the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. Two separate registry systems operating side by side in the same market create a frequent zone of conflict: the company carrying a term in its trade name meets the business that registered the same term as a trademark. This article covers the differences between the two rights and the principles for resolving the conflict.
Uğurcan Tekin · Beyza Erdemir28 August 2026
Trademark
The UDRP: A Global Arbitral Route against Domain Name Piracy
A domain name identical to your trademark has been registered by someone else and parked with a for-sale notice. The globally accepted way to recover it without going to court is ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. This article covers the three cumulative conditions of a UDRP complaint, how the procedure runs, and how disputes differ under the .tr extension.
Uğurcan Tekin · Şevval Ezgi Demir28 August 2026
Regulatory/Insights
Official Gazette Weekly Update — 5–11 October 2026: The Regulation on Age Verification on Social Networks, the Resolution of Principle on the Monitoring of Corporate E-mail and Electronic Notification in Tax Matters
Resmî Gazete Haftalık Gelişmeler — 05.10–11.10.2026: Sosyal Ağlarda Yaş Doğrulama Yönetmeliği, Kurumsal E-Posta Denetimine İlişkin İlke Kararı ve Vergide Elektronik Tebligat
This legal update presents a selection of the regulations, communiqués, board decisions and Constitutional Court decisions published in the Official Gazette issues Nos. 33391 to 33397 between 5 October 2026 and 11 October 2026. No duplicate issue was published between these dates. The update covers one new regulation, one resolution of principle, four amendments to regulations, two communiqués and ten individual application decisions.
01
Introduction
In the executive and administrative section of the week, the Cybersecurity Presidency’s Regulation on the Provision of Differentiated (Child-Specific) Services by Social Network Providers and on Age Verification was published in the Official Gazette dated 10 October 2026. The Regulation will enter into force on 1 November 2026. Under the Regulation, a social network provider may not provide services to children who have not attained the age of fifteen. For existing accounts opened before the date of entry into force, age verification must be carried out by 31 March 2027.
The Personal Data Protection Board’s decision No. 2026/2035 dated 16 September 2026 on the monitoring of corporate e-mail accounts and of communication channels used for the performance of work was published in the Official Gazette dated 8 October 2026. In the same week, the amounts set out in certain articles of the Regulation on Measures Regarding the Prevention of Laundering Proceeds of Crime and Financing of Terrorism were amended, the date in the provisional article of the communiqué on the application of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code (Law No. 6102) was changed to 1 January 2028 (1/1/2028), and the procedures and principles concerning the electronic notification system were redetermined by the Tax Procedure Law General Communiqué (Serial No. 596). In the judicial section, ten individual application decisions of the Plenary of the Constitutional Court were published. No instrument was identified in the indices of the issues covered by this update amending the legislation on industrial property, intellectual and artistic works or competition.
Under the Regulation entering into force on 1 November 2026, a social network provider may not provide services to children below the age of fifteen; existing accounts are to be age-verified by 31 March 2027.
02
Decisions and Legislation of the Week
Regulation on Age Verification on Social Networks and Differentiated Child-Specific Services
Reference, Legal Basis and Scope
The Regulation, issued by the Presidency of the Republic (the Cybersecurity Presidency, “the Presidency”), was published in the Official Gazette dated 10 October 2026 and numbered 33396. The Regulation was prepared on the basis of the seventh, twentieth and twenty-fifth paragraphs of Additional Article 4 of Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Publications on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed through Such Publications. The Regulation covers domestic or foreign-based social network providers accessible from Türkiye and users, as well as the acts and procedures concerning the differentiated (child-specific) services to be provided to children who have attained the age of fifteen, age verification, parental control tools and objection mechanisms.
The legislation provides: Under the first paragraph of Article 5 of the Regulation, “A social network provider may not provide services to children who have not attained the age of fifteen.” Under the third paragraph of the same Article, the protection of personal data is the governing principle in age verification processes, and methods that allow only the age threshold to be determined, rather than identification, are used.
Age Verification Token
Under Article 6 of the Regulation, a social network provider must verify the user’s age status by means of an age verification token at the account creation stage. Account opening requests of children who are found, as a result of age verification, not to have attained the age of fifteen are refused. The accounts of children found to have attained the age of fifteen are made subject to the differentiated service principles set out in Article 8. Where there is reasonable suspicion that a verified account is being used contrary to the determined age range, the account is suspended, and age verification by means of an age verification token is required for the account to be used again.
Under Article 7 of the Regulation, age verification is carried out through the e-Government Gateway. The token is generated, at the user’s request, by using the online service provided by the Presidency and is uploaded by the user to the platform of the relevant social network provider. The token contains only the information as to whether the user has attained the age of fifteen and, if the user has attained the age of fifteen, whether the user has attained the age of eighteen. A social network provider may not use the age verification token for any purpose other than age verification. Users who are not resident in Türkiye and are present there temporarily are exempt from the control mechanisms relating to age verification. For these users, an exceptional token is created, upon their application, by using passport information.
Principles Applicable to Accounts of Children Who Have Attained the Age of Fifteen
Under Article 8 of the Regulation, a social network provider applies high-level privacy settings by default for the purpose of protecting the personal data of a child user who has attained the age of fifteen, and enables data to be processed at a minimum level. The fifth paragraph of the same Article lists the principles to be applied to these accounts. Accordingly, no service capable of producing an addiction-forming effect may be provided. Accounts are provided as private accounts by default and may not be offered with the option of being public. Only the accounts that the account follows may send messages to it, and “seen” information may not be displayed in messages. The account may not include a live broadcasting feature. No interface, design or function may be provided that enables visual content to be presented consecutively through scrolling, touching, clicking or similar user actions, or automatically.
The legislation provides: Under subparagraph (h) of the fifth paragraph of Article 8 of the Regulation, “Accounts of children who have attained the age of fifteen may not be customised according to the child’s behaviour; personal data belonging to the child may not be made the subject of profiling or personalised commercial advertising activities.” Under subparagraph (d) of the same paragraph, a social network provider may not synchronise the child’s account with telephone directories, contact and user lists, e-mail address books and similar sources. Under the same subparagraph, data obtained in breach of the paragraph and the matching, inference and recommendation records generated from such data are deleted without delay.
Parental Control Tools and Objection Mechanism
Under Article 9 of the Regulation, parental control tools include, as a minimum, mechanisms for controlling account and feature settings, for making fee-based transactions such as purchases, rentals and paid subscriptions subject to parental permission or approval and setting a spending limit for such transactions, for monitoring, setting and limiting usage time, and for location sharing. These tools are offered with a Turkish language option and, when activated, the child is expressly notified.
Under Article 10 of the Regulation, a social network provider is obliged to establish a free and accessible application and objection mechanism, with a Turkish language option, for objections concerning the age verification result, the suspension or closure of an account, and the measures applied within the scope of the differentiated service. Applications and objections may not be examined by fully automated systems and are subject to meaningful human review.
Sanctions, Transitional Provision and Entry into Force
Under Article 11 of the Regulation, where the obligations are not fulfilled, the relevant provisions of Additional Article 4 of Law No. 5651 apply to matters concerning the imposition, notification and lifting of sanctions and the objection procedures. Before a sanction is imposed, the social network provider is notified of the non-compliance and is granted a reasonable period, according to the nature of the non-compliance, to remedy it.
Under Provisional Article 1, for existing accounts that were opened before the date of entry into force of the Regulation and have not been verified by means of an age verification token, verification by means of an age verification token must be carried out by the social network provider, at least once, by 31 March 2027. Existing accounts of children found not to have attained the age of fifteen are closed after information is given. The Regulation enters into force on 1 November 2026.
Dates relating to the Regulation (Subject · Date · Source)
Publication in the Official Gazette — 10 October 2026 — OG issue 33396
Entry into force — 1 November 2026 — Regulation
Deadline for age verification of existing accounts — 31 March 2027 — Provisional Article 1
Resolution of Principle No. 2026/2035 of the Personal Data Protection Board
The Personal Data Protection Board’s (“the Board”) decision No. 2026/2035 dated 16 September 2026 was published in the Official Gazette dated 8 October 2026 and numbered 33394. The decision concerns the procedures and principles to be observed in the monitoring of communication channels used for the performance of work, in particular corporate e-mail accounts allocated to employees by employers. The decision states that the fact that the means of communication belongs to the employer or is used in the workplace does not confer on the employer an unlimited power of monitoring over employees’ communication activities.
The Board announced that, where non-compliance with the obligations is established, action will be taken against the relevant data controllers pursuant to Article 18 of Law No. 6698 on the Protection of Personal Data (“PDPL”). The details of the decision are set out in the legal update on the Decisions of the Personal Data Protection Board dated October 2026.
Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing: Amendment to the Regulation on Measures
The Regulation Amending the Regulation on Measures Regarding the Prevention of Laundering Proceeds of Crime and Financing of Terrorism was put into effect by Presidential Decision No. 11845 dated 6 October 2026 and was published in the Official Gazette dated 7 October 2026 and numbered 33393. The amendment entered into force on the date of its publication.
The amendment replaced, in subparagraph (b) of the first paragraph of Article 5 of the Regulation, the amount “TRY 185,000” with “TRY 370,000” and the amount “TRY 15,000” with “TRY 30,000”, and, in subparagraph (c) of the same paragraph, the amount “TRY 15,000” with “TRY 30,000”. The amounts “TRY 15,000” in the first and second paragraphs of Articles 24 and 24/A of the Regulation were also replaced with “TRY 30,000”.
The legislation provides: Under the provision added to the first paragraph of Article 16 of the Regulation, “Where verification is carried out by financial institutions through internet or mobile service channels, or by means of a one-time verification code sent by short message service (SMS OTP) to the customer’s mobile telephone number registered with the obliged party and previously verified, a specimen signature need not be obtained.” Under the third paragraph added to Article 38 of the Regulation, only an obligation compliance audit report is prepared in respect of obliged parties other than those falling under subparagraph (f) of the first paragraph of Article 3. Where a breach of obligation is identified during the audit, this report also takes the place of a breach of obligation examination report.
Amendment to the Communiqué on Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code
The Ministry of Trade’s Communiqué Amending the Communiqué on the Procedures and Principles Regarding the Application of Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code (Law No. 6102) was published in the Official Gazette dated 10 October 2026 and numbered 33396 and entered into force on the date of its publication. The amendment replaced the date “1/1/2027” (1 January 2027) in Provisional Article 1 of the Communiqué, published in the Official Gazette dated 15 September 2018 and numbered 30536, with “1/1/2028” (1 January 2028). Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code governs loss of capital and over-indebtedness.
Tax Procedure Law General Communiqué (Serial No. 596): Electronic Notification
Scope and Obligation to Join the System
The Communiqué of the Ministry of Treasury and Finance (Revenue Administration) was published in the Official Gazette dated 11 October 2026 and numbered 33397 and entered into force on the date of its publication. The Communiqué sets out the procedures and principles for the application of Article 107/A of the Tax Procedure Law (Law No. 213), as amended by Article 9 of Law No. 7587 dated 24 June 2026. The Communiqué repealed the Tax Procedure Law General Communiqué (Serial No. 456), published in the Official Gazette dated 27 August 2015 and numbered 29458.
Under Article 5 of the Communiqué, corporate income tax payers, income tax payers taxed on an actual basis on account of their commercial, agricultural and professional earnings, general partnerships and ordinary limited partnerships, and persons in whose name registration is made upon the first acquisition of those goods in List (II) annexed to the Special Consumption Tax Law (Law No. 4760) that are subject to recording and registration are obliged to join the electronic notification (e-notification) system and to use that system.
Time Limits and Date of Notification
Under Article 7 of the Communiqué, corporate income tax payers, income tax payers taxed on an actual basis, general partnerships and ordinary limited partnerships that had not joined the system before the date of publication of the Communiqué and are obliged to use the system must join it by the end of the month following the publication of the Communiqué. For those whose tax liability is established after the date of publication of the Communiqué, the time limit is 15 days following the date of commencement of business. Under Provisional Article 1, those who joined the system before 1 July 2026 continue to use the system with their existing user codes and passwords, without making a new application.
The legislation provides: Under the third paragraph of Article 9 of the Communiqué, “An electronically signed notification document is deemed to have been served on the addressee at the end of the fifth day following the date on which it reaches the electronic notification system.” Under Article 10 of the Communiqué, the fact that the information messages to be sent to the mobile telephone number or e-mail address could not be sent for any reason does not affect the notification period or the validity of the notification.
Individual Application Decisions of the Plenary of the Constitutional Court
Ten individual application decisions of the Plenary of the Constitutional Court were published in the Official Gazette dated 6 October 2026 and numbered 33392. The Hakan Şimşek decision dated 12 May 2026 (Application No. 2022/102726) concerns the allegations that the freedoms of expression and of the press were violated on account of a conviction for the offence of knowingly and willingly aiding an organisation established for the purpose of committing crime, without being a member of it. The Court unanimously held that the freedoms of expression and of the press, guaranteed under Articles 26 and 28 of the Constitution, had not been violated, and found the allegation that the right to a fair trial had been violated inadmissible for being manifestly ill-founded.
Among the other decisions published in the same issue, the Melda Soyugüzel decision dated 2 July 2026 (Application No. 2021/29752) concerns the allegations that the right to a fair hearing and the presumption of innocence were violated in a reinstatement action brought by a person employed as a security guard, following the termination of the employment contract on account of the cancellation of that person’s security card. The Pınar Gül decision dated 2 July 2026 (Application No. 2022/75743) concerns the refusal of a request for transfer to a permanent worker post, and the Mahmut Kaçan decision dated 8 January 2026 (Application No. 2021/56755) concerns the right to hold meetings and demonstration marches, on account of the administration’s decision banning all events throughout the province. The other six decisions bear application Nos. 2019/789, 2020/9501, 2021/24997, 2023/31244, 2023/91027 and 2025/57667. The operative parts of the nine decisions other than the Hakan Şimşek decision are not examined in this update.
Other Publications of the Week
The Regulation Amending the Regulation on the Rights of Passengers Travelling by Rail, published in the Official Gazette dated 10 October 2026, replaced the phrases “180 days” (“180 günden”) in Articles 48 and 49 of the Regulation with “90 days” (“90 günden”), and set at TRY 9,473, in the first paragraph of Article 63, the administrative fine to be imposed where matters contrary to the Regulation are identified. In the Official Gazette dated 8 October 2026, the definition of futures contract was amended in two regulations concerning specialised commodity exchanges.
The Official Gazette dated 10 October 2026 also contained the Decision on the Cancellation of the Operating Permission of Parakolay Elektronik Para A.Ş. The content of this decision is not examined in this update.
Publications of the week (5–11 October 2026) (OG date / issue · Decision / instrument · Outcome / entry into force)
6 Oct 2026 / 33392 — Constitutional Court Plenary: ten individual application decisions — Hakan Şimşek: freedoms of expression and press not violated
7 Oct 2026 / 33393 — Amendment to the Regulation on Measures (Decision No. 11845) — Effective on publication
8 Oct 2026 / 33394 — Personal Data Protection Board decision (No. 2026/2035) — Decision dated 16 September 2026
8 Oct 2026 — Amendments to two regulations on specialised commodity exchanges — Definition of futures contract amended
10 Oct 2026 / 33396 — Regulation on age verification and differentiated services on social networks — In force 1/11/2026; existing accounts 31/3/2027
10 Oct 2026 / 33396 — Amendment to the Communiqué on Article 376 of the Commercial Code — Effective on publication; provisional article date 1/1/2028
10 Oct 2026 — Amendment to the Regulation on rail passengers’ rights — “180 days” → “90 days”; administrative fine TRY 9,473
10 Oct 2026 — Cancellation of operating permission of Parakolay Elektronik Para A.Ş. — Not examined in this update
11 Oct 2026 / 33397 — Tax Procedure Law General Communiqué (Serial No. 596) — Effective on publication; Serial No. 456 repealed
03
Conclusion
In the week of 5 October 2026 – 11 October 2026, the Regulation on the Provision of Differentiated (Child-Specific) Services by Social Network Providers and on Age Verification was published. The Regulation will enter into force on 1 November 2026, and age verification for existing accounts will be carried out by 31 March 2027. Pursuant to the Regulation, a social network provider may not provide services to children who have not attained the age of fifteen. Accounts of children who have attained the age of fifteen are subject to the principles listed in Article 8 of the Regulation.
The Personal Data Protection Board’s decision No. 2026/2035 on the monitoring of corporate e-mail and work communication channels was published on 8 October 2026. In the Regulation on Measures, the amount “TRY 185,000” was replaced with “TRY 370,000” and the amounts “TRY 15,000” with “TRY 30,000”. The date in Provisional Article 1 of the Communiqué on Article 376 of the Turkish Commercial Code became 1 January 2028 (1/1/2028). Pursuant to the Tax Procedure Law General Communiqué (Serial No. 596), taxpayers within scope that had not joined the system before the date of publication of the Communiqué are required to join the electronic notification system by the end of the month following the publication of the Communiqué. Ten individual application decisions of the Plenary of the Constitutional Court were published on 6 October 2026; in the Hakan Şimşek decision, it was held that the freedoms of expression and of the press had not been violated.
Full briefing noteDownload the bilingual PDF version of this briefing note.
Reach us about a new filing, an office action, an opposition deadline or a portfolio you would like reviewed. Every enquiry receives a clear assessment of scope, timing and cost before any work begins.
Istanbul Office
Let's talk.
Our offices are in the Ferko Signature building on Büyükdere Caddesi, at the heart of Istanbul's business district. Whether you are filing a single trademark or restructuring an international portfolio, the first conversation is always with the attorney who will actually handle the file.
Court proceedings, compensation and criminal actions, contract drafting and advisory work are handled by our law firm, Devin Law & IP, at devinlaw.com.tr. If your matter belongs there we will say so at the first call rather than after an engagement letter.
On Büyükdere Caddesi — the spine of Istanbul's central business district — Ferko Signature places the office minutes from the TÜRKPATENT liaison offices and the headquarters of the companies we act for.
Build a career where registration work is done properly — with the statute open, the case law read and the calendar under control.
Why Devin Patent
Learn the register from the inside. Learn why every entry on it matters.
Attorneyship is a craft learned by doing it under supervision. We train candidates towards the TÜRKPATENT trademark and patent attorney examinations and give them real files from the start — under review, but real.
Junior colleagues work directly with senior attorneys from their first week — search reports, specification drafting, responses to office actions, opposition files and international portfolio administration. Mentoring is structured, feedback is continuous, and responsibility grows with demonstrated ability rather than seniority alone.
To apply, send your CV and a short note describing your interest in working with our firm to info@devinlaw.com.tr. Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis and every candidate receives a response.
Trademark & Patent Attorneys
Registered attorneys, or candidates preparing for the TÜRKPATENT examinations, who want to run international portfolios rather than process forms.
Internships
Internships for law and engineering students — hands-on exposure to searches, filing procedures, bulletin watch and opposition files alongside experienced mentors.
Business Services
Finance, administration and docketing roles — the operational spine that keeps deadlines from being missed.
Independent international directories consistently rank our team among the leading practitioners in intellectual property and media law in Türkiye. Our intellectual property and media practice has been recognised by The Legal 500 EMEA, the WTR 1000, Managing IP's IP STARS and Media Law International in both the 2026 and 2025 editions. Click any ranking below for the full details.
2026Current Edition
The rankings published for the current cycle — across intellectual property and media law.
Five Categories · 2026IP STARS — Managing IP
In the IP STARS 2026 rankings published by Managing IP, Devin Law & IP is ranked in five practice categories in Türkiye — with Uğurcan Tekin and İnci Özçilsal recognised among Türkiye's leading IP practitioners as Rising Stars, supported by eleven client testimonials on prosecution, enforcement and opposition work.
All Details →
Recommended · 2026WTR 1000
In the 2026 edition, World Trademark Review's WTR 1000 recognises Uğurcan Tekin individually for trademark protection and international IP strategies — identifying the world's leading trademark professionals through extensive research among clients and peers, including his work on global strategies for multinational corporations and proceedings before WIPO.
All Details →
Ranked · EMEA 2026The Legal 500 EMEA
Ranked in the Legal 500 EMEA 2026 edition in Intellectual Property and Media & Entertainment. Uğurcan Tekin is listed as a Next Generation Partner, with İnci Özçilsal and Beyza Erdemir recognised as Key Lawyers — supported by directory commentary and client testimonials on the team's patent, advertising and brand protection work.
All Details →
Tier 2 · 2026Media Law International
In its 2026 rankings, Media Law International places Devin Law & IP at Tier 2 of the Türkiye country chapter among the leading law firms for media law, with Uğurcan Tekin named among the Top 10 Recommended Media Lawyers in Turkey — reflecting expertise in digital media regulation, content management and broadcasting standards.
All Details →
2025Previous Edition
Recognitions earned in the preceding ranking cycle by the same intellectual property and media practice.
Ranked · EMEA 2025The Legal 500 EMEA
Ranked in the Legal 500 EMEA 2025 edition in Intellectual Property and Media & Entertainment, with Uğurcan Tekin as practice head. The editorial assessment highlighted advisory work for the full spectrum of media stakeholders — from multinational media companies to individual actors, directors and agents — and the team's depth in digital media, online content and data privacy.
All Details →
Ranked · 2025Media Law International
In its 2025 assessments, Media Law International recognised the practice as one of Türkiye's leading media law firms, with Uğurcan Tekin selected among the ten recommended media law practitioners in Türkiye.
All Details →
Recommended Firm · 2025IP STARS — Managing IP
In the IP STARS rankings published in 2025 by Managing IP, the practice was listed among the recommended firms in Türkiye — international recognition of the breadth of experience and strategic approach the team brings to intellectual property work.
All Details →
Recommended Firm · 2025WTR 1000
In the 2025 edition, World Trademark Review's WTR 1000 listed the practice among the recommended trademark firms in the Türkiye ranking — reflecting the team's work on filing strategy, portfolio management and contentious trademark matters for domestic and international clients.